The term "known of" refers to being aware of someone or something's existence or characteristics. Use it when talking about things or people you've heard about but may not have direct experience with. For instance, you might say, "I've known of that band for a while, but I've never actually heard their music."
If you say "known of," you're talking about being aware that something or someone exists. You may not have direct or in-depth knowledge about it, but you've at least heard of it. For example, you could say, "I've known of that restaurant," when you pass by an eatery you've never dined in but have heard people mention before.
Let's look at what it means and how it's used:
The term “known” is the past participle of “know.” In Middle English, it was “knouen,” which meant "well-known, famous, notorious." From the early 14th century, it was used to mean "recognized, not secret; familiar, not strange."
"What is the form of Africa? What is known of the interior of Africa? How is Africa bounded?"
- The Geographical Mirror. Containing an Accurate ..., 1817
To help you better understand how to use "known of," here are some examples from various scenarios:
This term also shows up in pop culture, typically when someone is talking about something they're aware of but haven't directly experienced.
Check out some examples:
Here are some other phrases you can use that mean the same thing:
"Known of" means being aware of something or someone but not necessarily having direct experience with it or them. It's like saying you've heard of a place but have never visited.
You can use "known of" as a verb phrase to talk about general awareness. For example, "I've known of that band for years, but I've never actually listened to their music."
"Known of" can be used in various settings, both formal and informal. It's common in conversations when you're talking about something you're aware of but haven't experienced firsthand.
No, it doesn't. Known of" can refer to places, concepts, things, or events—pretty much anything you can be aware of without direct experience.
It's generally a weaker form of knowledge, signaling awareness but not necessarily deep understanding or firsthand experience.
It can, but not always. Saying you've "known of" something could imply that you missed out on directly experiencing it, but that's not always the case.
"Known of" appears in both speaking and writing. However, it's often more common in casual conversations.
While similar, "heard of" usually implies even less familiarity than "known of." If you've "known of" something, you might have more than just secondhand information about it.
Yes, that's correct. In this case, you're expressing regret that you weren't aware of something when perhaps you should have been.
Not by itself. Whether or not there's a sense of regret depends on the context in which it's used.
The phrase "known of" is a handy way to talk about something you're aware of but haven't experienced directly. It's a good fit for different settings, from casual chats to formal discussions.
Here's a quick recap: